July 3, 2009

Rick Warren Does it, Again

What do you think, is Rick Warren willing to say or do anything in order to be “America’s Pastor”?

The following article by Joseph Farah points out the Christian hypocrisy of Warren that drives people crazy. He seems to stand for anything except his Christian faith and fellow believers. He is willing to trash America and historical Christianity and for that matter history as well. He forgets that far more non-Muslims and other Muslims have been and were slaughtered by Islam not only during the Crusades, but in recent history as well. The Crusades were started only after the treat of Islam became so great that it threatened the bastions of Christianity. Before that, Islam had either bribed or lied to Christian leaders telling them that they were not interested in destroying the Christian faith. Their violent slaughtering of anyone or any nation that stood in their way proved otherwise, and only then did Christianity respond. Before that time, most of the known world had fallen under the sward of Islam.

So, what do you think? Does Warren’s latest action show him only to want to hog some sort of limelight or do you think he is correct in his actions?

PastorBlastor

—-

Rick Warren Does it, Again
By Joseph Farah, World Net Daily, July 3, 2009

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102848

While millions of other Americans will be celebrating Independence Day weekend, Rick Warren, often called “America’s Pastor,” will be serving as the keynote speaker for a Saudi-backed Muslim group that promotes a radical strain of Wahhabi Islam in about 80 percent of U.S. mosques.

I don’t know about you, but I’m getting tired of Rick Warren’s bad judgments.

This time Warren will be schmoozing with the Islamic Society of North America, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood – just as are al-Qaida, Hamas and most other Muslim terrorist organizations.

ISNA puts on a façade of moderation, yet, according to terrorism expert Steven Emerson, it “convenes annual conferences where Islamist militants have been given a platform to incite violence and promote hatred.”

After Hamas leader Mousa Marzook was arrested in 1997, ISNA raised money for his defense. He was eventually deported.

ISNA condemned the U.S. government’s seizure of the financial assets of Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad after Sept. 11.

“I think ISNA has been an umbrella, also a promoter of groups that have been involved in terrorism,” explains Emerson. “I am not going to accuse the ISNA of being directly involved in terrorism. I will say ISNA has sponsored extremists, racists, people who call for jihad against the United States.”

I could go on with many more details about ISNA. Suffice it to say it is no friend of Christianity and no friend of America.

So what is Rick Warren doing speaking at the group’s national conference?

I don’t know what Warren’s agenda is. He would probably say he doesn’t have one. But I can tell you the effect of his appearance – it is designed to disinfect and rehabilitate a group that is dangerous and subversive to U.S. national security.

But it should surprise no one, at this point, that Rick Warren will be there. One of the first times I ever wrote about Rick Warren was in 2006 when he took an equally misguided trip to Syria to meet with dictator Bashar Assad and praise him for his pleasant treatment of Christians. Syria was then and remains today one of the world’s leading state sponsors of Islamic terrorism. Almost every terrorist group in the world maintains offices there. Nevertheless, Rick Warren said, while in Syria, that the country “does not allow extremism of any kind.”

Less than a week after Warren’s absurd proclamations in Syria, a Christian leader in Lebanon, former President Pierre Gemayel, was assassinated in the streets of Beirut. Everyone in Lebanon knows who killed him – the Syrian government.

As I wrote at the time, “it is imperative that Christians – and especially Christian leaders – have discernment about evil in our world. And true, unadulterated evil is what you have running Syria today. The government led by Bashar Assad, who met with Rick Warren last week, is anti-American, anti-freedom, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish and pro-terrorist.

“Rick Warren should know this. Yet, he has placed himself in a position of apologizing and excusing the government in Damascus, one of the most evil on the face of the earth.

“It is not an exaggeration to say that government got cover last week as a result of Warren’s shameful public relations on its behalf. I won’t go so far to say there was a direct cause-and-effect relationship between Warren’s embrace of Assad and the assassination of Gemayel yesterday, but it is both a coincidence of striking proportions as well as an illustration of the true character of Damascus’ totalitarian police-state regime.”

In 2007, Rick Warren was one of 100 or so “evangelical leaders” who signed a document begging forgiveness from Muslims for all the evil deeds perpetrated against them by Christians.

Rick Warren loves to apologize for things he didn’t do, for things other people did that weren’t wrong, even for things that occurred hundreds of years before he was born – such as apologizing to Muslims worldwide for atrocities committed against their ancestors during the Crusades.

In 2007, he also apologized for American “excesses in the war on terrorism.”

And he has apologized for the church because it hasn’t done enough about the spread of AIDS and problems like global warming.

Yet, I must observe that despite his predilection for apologies, he has a great deal of trouble owning up to his own personal mistakes.

Once again, just like his trip to Syria, serving as the keynote speaker to the Islamic Society of North America is a very, very bad personal mistake – one that demonstrates a complete lack of spiritual discernment.

June 26, 2009

The Scarecrow Is Dead…

The Scarecrow Is Dead…
by Lee Hemen
June 25, 2009

In the Wizard of Oz the Scarecrow searches for a magical wizard to give him the brains he thinks he lacks. He discovers at the end of his journey that he does not need anyone to give him what he already had inside of himself just the way he had been created. Michael Jackson’s life reflects the same sad tale of the Scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz and in a sad twist of fate, Jackson played the Scarecrow in the musical movie The Wiz. And now the Scarecrow is dead.

However, excuse me if this sounds kind of harsh, not very politically correct, and perhaps offensive to your ears, but why in the world are we celebrating someone whose life was reflected in someone who tried to stuff himself with all kinds of things and was never satisfied with who he was and how God had created him?

Jackson was just plain weird and you add to this that he was a suspected child molester, it makes one wonder at our society today. Have we fallen so far from our moral compass that we no longer see anyone with any kind of perverted proclivity as depraved? Do we excuse immoral behavior because of a person’s celebrity status?

Michael Jackson’s life was one tortured act followed by another tortured act. He could not be happy with himself, who he was, and how God had created him. While having great talent, it was truly lost and overshadowed on how he lived his tragic life. No one can watch the videos of Jackson and not go away shaking their heads in wonder at his talent. But one also is left with the searing memories of him being hauled off to jail, facing charges for molestation, and his constant addiction to altering his appearance.

It is as if anyone who can lay claim to being able to sing, dance, and be flamboyant then we will excuse and overlook any of their perversions when they die.

Death has now claimed one of the most flamboyant and odd people of the 20th century, Michael Jackson. From his being ashamed of his race, his skin color, his nose, and his overall appearance one wonders how Jackson would appear the next time you saw him. His skeleton frame, bleached skin, and surgically regenerated face, fake straightened jet black hair, left you thinking that there was certainly something very wrong with him psychologically as an individual.

It was therefore no surprise to many when it was uncovered that Jackson was having sexual encounters with children at his Wonderland estate. He lived in a different realm.

We have no idea exactly what Jackson believed spiritually. Being raised a Jehovah’s Witness, then flirting with Scientology, and any assortment of esoteric religions such as Kabala, a mystical form of Judaism, and finally a confessed conversion to Islam, Jackson had wandered far off the reservation as far as his faith was concerned. Add to this his completely odd lifestyle and the sum total of Jackson’s life is one of shambles and personal tragedy. He seems to never have been truly happy.

Perhaps his actions can be laid at the feet of a father who was domineering or being overly exposed to the entertainment industry at an early age. You often find those who enter into the Hollywood scene as normal, becoming abnormal in short order in order to fit into the altered reality of celebrity. Therefore, I find it difficult and I wince when I hear the talking heads say he is now “resting in peace.” If his death was like his life, no he isn’t. And if you add to this that his actions spoke volumes as to what he adhered to, then no one should wonder where Michael Jackson now resides. Unless I am uniformed as to another quick conversion by Jackson to yet another religious proclivity of the moment, as a Christian I suspect that he has certainly not found the happy hunting grounds.

Jackson’s death should make us as people to pause and reflect on what we truly believe and why. If we run after the things of the world, when death greets us, we may find ourselves unceremoniously, like Jackson, wrapped in a coroner’s body bag being carried out of our home and being pried open to discover what indeed did kill us. Jesus told His followers that He was the only way, the only truth, and the only life and no one came to the Father in heaven except through a belief in Him as Messiah. In fact, Jesus said that once one placed their faith in Him, they would be changed, and the world would know they had done so by their converted attitude and actions. They would now wholeheartedly love and live for God and love others as they loved themselves. Jackson was the antithesis of this.

The Scarecrow, Michael Jackson is dead. Sadly, he never found what he was searching for in life. And he will always be remembered not just for his singing, dancing, and flamboyant lifestyle, but the sad oddity of his unfulfilled life.

When death comes to you, how do you want to be remembered by those around you?

This article is the copyrighted 2009 © property of Lee Hemen and may not be copied or reproduced in any way shape or form without using the full text of this entire article, and getting the permission of its author.

June 21, 2009

How to Stand Firm In the Lord – Philippians 4:1-7

How to Stand Firm In the Lord – Philippians 4:1-7
By Pastor Lee Hemen
June 21, 2009 AM

What is to be the main character quality that Christians are to display to the world around them and to one another? When I have asked that question before I get all kinds of answers. However, if we were to look into the pages of Scripture we would find that the one overriding character quality that believers are to display far above all others that, in truth, all others flow from is: the peace of God. It is from this inner confidence that flows from our faith whereby joy, gentleness, and assurance are found. In fact, when you find a Christian that has difficulty with his fellow believers it is because they have no inner peace. They cannot let go and allow God to work in the lives of others.

My father taught me something I have never forgotten. It was after Ed and I had fought about whatever. All I remember is that I had said some pretty harsh things to Ed, and he had with me as well. My father grabbed me and told Ed, “I will speak to you later.” We both knew what that meant. I protested loudly that the fight had not been my fault and that I had not started it. Imagine my surprise when he said, “Lee, you can be right as rain and still be wrong as dirt.” Perhaps this was the case for Euodia and Syntyche. They evidently needed to be able to find the peace of God in their lives. Let’s discover what Paul related to them about how to stand firm in the Lord.

Paul wrote the Philippians: “Therefore, my brothers, you whom I love and long for, my joy and crown, that is how you should stand firm in the Lord, dear friends! I plead with Euodia and I plead with Syntyche to agree with each other in the Lord. Yes, and I ask you, loyal yokefellow, help these women who have contended at my side in the cause of the gospel, along with Clement and the rest of my fellow workers, whose names are in the book of life. Rejoice in the Lord always. I will say it again: Rejoice! Let your gentleness be evident to all. The Lord is near. Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.” (Philippians 4:1-7) Standing firm in the Lord for Paul meant several things.

My father had a great sense of humor and he loved to tease us kids. He often laughed and loved a good joke and liked to make up nonsensical rhymes and songs. Have you ever been around someone who is joyful? It can either be irritating or a blessing. It can be irritating when it is phony and a blessing when it is true joy. I hate false joy that is concocted. It is shallow and shows that the person truly does not have the Sprit in their lives but is trying to pretend that they really do. God does not like phoniness either and neither did Paul. This is why…

First, Paul wanted them to know the power of joy in the Lord! Joy is not trying to be nice or even a sense of happiness. Rather, it is an inner quality that bubbles up from the wellspring of God. Why would Paul want them to experience this? The Philippian church meant a lot to the Apostle Paul. We read how he felt about them in almost every line of his letter to them. We discover it in Paul’s main concerns for them. As the RSV translates what Paul writes: “I ask you also, true yokefellow, help these women… .” He desired that the Philippians “help” these two members to discover the peace of God. He wanted their faith to be characterized by joy. This is why he tells them to “Rejoice in the Lord always. I will say it again: Rejoice!” (Philippians 4:4) He had written the Thessalonians to “Be joyful always!” (1 Thessalonians 5:16) Jesus had taught that His followers to “Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.” (Matthew 5:12) And He related to them to “rejoice that your names are written in heaven.” (Luke 10:20) Standing firm in the Lord means you know the power of the joy of the Lord in your life!

My Dad was a quiet man. He never cursed, he hardly ever lost his cool, and he usually thought out what he was going to say before he said it. Sometimes, this caused us great anxiety while we waited for his answer! However, for some folks they think that the more softly they speak or the more unassuming they are, then they are being “like Jesus.” This is simply not true. Jesus was the most stand out guy you could be around. He was noticeable. And so should believers be as well. However, Christians are to display a sweet spirit that is punctuated by inner spiritual strength. This is why…

Secondly, Paul wanted their gentleness to be evident with everyone! Gentleness is not limp-wristed weakness or acquiescing your convictions! It is standing firm in true humility with Christ. Paul wanted  Euodia’s and Syntyche’s “gentleness” to be “evident to all.” When the Christian does this, he stands as a servant first and foremost. True humility comes from true servanthood. Just as Jesus came to serve, His followers should seek to serve others first as well. Paul would write his pastor friend Titus to “slander no one, to be peaceable and considerate, and to show true humility toward all men.” (Titus 3:2) The attitude that Paul wanted these two Christians to show one another was one whereby they forgave one another even when they were unjustly provoked, to be ready to forgive any slight, be kind in judging others and to judge themselves by a tougher measure thereby showing a sweetness of spirit. It is an outward quality that is readily evident. Kind of like Jesus related when He said that people do not “light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven.” (Matthew 5:15-16) And that is what gentleness does. It reflects the light of Jesus and takes no credit and it is more than happy to do so! As Gill wrote: “Blessed are the meek,…. Who are not easily provoked to anger; who patiently bear, and put up with injuries and affronts; carry themselves courteously, and affably to all; have the meanest thoughts of themselves, and the best of others; do not envy the gifts and graces of other men; are willing to be instructed and admonished, by the meanest of the saints; [and] quietly submit to the will of God.” Standing tall in the Lord means allowing gentleness to rule your life.

Fathers have a lot to worry about but not when it concerns things they have no control over. Jesus asked His followers if their worrying had added even one inch to their height, and of course it had not. We would like to think that the more we worry about something, shows our true concern for it. This is simply not true. In fact, for the believer it can show a weak faith. This is why…

Third, Paul desired that they not worry needlessly! Personal strife often comes from senseless worrying! Perhaps this is what Euodia and Syntyche suffered from. As believers we are to be concerned in how we live our lives before the Lord; we are to be concerned for how we take care of the bodies God has given us; we are to be concerned how we conduct ourselves in front of others; and we are to be concerned in how we spend our time, talent, and treasure. However, we are not to worry about the things we have no control over in life. God is in control. He knows our beginning and our end and the very number of hairs on our head! (Even though some of us have less for Him to count!) In fact the saints of God should not be anxiously distressed or concerned for the things of this world, but be content with what God provides! The answer for Euodia and Syntyche that Paul would give any believer that becomes obsessive in their worry was: “Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God.” (Philippians 4:6) The answer to worry is prayer mixed with thanksgiving, and then you can go before the Lord with just about anything. However, the person who is possessed by the worries of life cannot clearly pray because they cannot hear God as they do. Those who are in an attitude of praise and thanksgiving have the mind of Christ and can hear Him rather than focusing on their worry. Standing firm in the Lord means allowing Him to worry about the things you cannot control.

The outcome of a life that is joyful, gentle, and confident in the Lord has “the peace of God, which transcends all understanding!” It is this peace that would “guard” their “hearts and… minds in Christ Jesus.” It is a life that stands firm in the Lord.

This article is the copyrighted 2009 © property of Lee Hemen and may not be copied or reproduced in any way shape or form without using the full text of this entire article, and getting the permission of its author.

June 14, 2009

Whose Side Are You Standing On? – Philippians 3:17-21

Whose Side Are You Standing On? – Philippians 3:17-21
By Pastor Lee Hemen
June 14, 2009 AM

We have many examples throughout our lives that influence us in how we live our lives. People become patterns for us for good or bad. These examples are important. In fact, studies have shown that if parents are abusive, alcoholic, promiscuous, or live other abusive kinds of lifestyles then their children have a far greater chance of growing up to be the same. Good examples therefore are good in life. What happens if the life we used to live was not such a good example? The Bible teaches us that there is hope in such a situation. However, there are also those who use Christians or churches as examples, or rather excuses, as to why they do not believe or do not attend. Folks have many reasons for rejecting the gospel. They will say it is because of something a Christian or a church did or did not do for them at some point in time. “I went to church and no one spoke to me.” “I bought something from someone who said they were a ‘Christian’ and they didn’t treat me very good!”

The examples my own father gave me while growing up have stayed with me. He taught me the good, the bad, and sometimes the ugly. I learned my sense of humor from my father, consistent discipline, to always be a gentleman, and to tell the truth. However, I also learned what it meant not to save a dime and to grow up poor. From that I did learn sacrifice and the value of money. I also learned the importance of getting and keeping a job, which, while my Dad was a hard worker, he did not stay at one job very long. He got easily bored. I learned the value of a getting an education. My father was just shy of one semester of getting his college degree and regretted it his entire life. And, finally, I learned to love God from my father. Sitting on hard wooden pews listening to the droning of the parish priest go on and on in Latin, all the while watching my father’s devotion, I was instilled with a sense of the sacred and what it meant to yearn for the answers of eternity.

Patterns are important whether it is making a bird house or being an example for others to follow. And so we discover that it does matter whose side we stand on in life. Christians are patterns for others as they watch our lives in Christ. Paul teaches us that a life lived for the Lord can be a good example or we can stand as an ungodly example for others to follow. Let’s see what he says.

Paul writes the Philippians, “Join with others in following my example, brothers, and take note of those who live according to the pattern we gave you. For, as I have often told you before and now say again even with tears, many live as enemies of the cross of Christ. Their destiny is destruction, their god is their stomach, and their glory is in their shame. Their mind is on earthly things. But our citizenship is in heaven. And we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ, who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.” (Philippians 3:17-21)

First, Paul asks Christians to stand tall with him in the Lord! Standing tall is more than height, it is holiness. Just as Paul had told the Ephesians, “Be imitators of God, therefore, as dearly loved children and live a life of love, just as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us as a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God,” (Ephesians 5:1-2) he also told the Philippians to “join with others in following my example.” What example did Paul follow? The example Paul followed was that of Jesus. He would bluntly tell others, “Therefore I urge you to imitate me… Follow my example, as I follow the example of Christ.” (1 Corinthians 4:16; 11:1) And this is the encouragement that all believers should follow. Jesus is the perfect example or person to pattern our lives after. Just as young children often want to be like their parents we, as the children of God, should want to be like Jesus. We should, as Paul suggests, “take note of those who live according to the pattern” that he has given us in Jesus. The believer’s life should be an open book, so-to-speak, for others to see and in fact it is whether we want to be or not. Paul asks Christians to stand tall with him in the Lord.

He began working as a copy boy at the Detroit Free Press when he was 13.  When his father died, the young man dropped out of school at age 17 to work full-time to help support his family.  One of his jobs was clipping “filler” articles (often in verse). He soon decided that he might as well write short poems rather than insert the nonsense written by others. His first published poem appeared in 1898. He went on to write over 11,000 poems, many of them syndicated in 300 newspapers and collected in 20 books. He was an Episcopalian with a strong spiritual sensitivity. His name was Edgar Guest and he wrote these familiar words: “I’d rather see a sermon than hear one, any day; I’d rather one would walk with me than merely tell the way; The eye’s a better pupil and more willing than the ear. Fine counsel is confusing, but example’s always clear, And the best of all the preachers are the men who live their creeds, For to see good put in action is what everybody needs. I soon can learn to do it if you’ll let me see it done; I can watch your hands in action, but your tongue too fast may run. And the lecture you deliver may be very wise and true, But I’d rather get my lessons by observing what you do. For I might misunderstand you and the high advice you give. But there’s no misunderstanding how you act and how you live.” (Edgar Albert Guest, 1881-1959) B. B. McKinney wrote the same idea with the following words: “While passing through this world of sin, and others your life shall view, Be clean and pure without, within; let others see Jesus in you. Your life’s a book before their eyes, they’re reading it through and through; Say, does it point them to the skies, do others see Jesus in you? Then live for Christ both day and night, be faithful, be brave and true, and lead the lost to life and Christ. Let others see Jesus in you. Refrain: Let others see Jesus in you, Let others see Jesus in you. Keep telling the story, be faithful and true; Let others see Jesus in you.” Christians are to stand tall with Paul in Christ.

Second, Paul warns Christians against standing with the world! One foot in the world means you are standing in deep do-do! Notice that Paul was actually broken-hearted, “with tears,” when he saw perhaps fellow believers or others living as “enemies of the cross of Christ.” What a wonderful confessional picture of Paul we have here. He actually wept over those who had wandered away from living their lives for the Lord! Why would this affect Paul so much? Because Paul knew that their “destiny is destruction, their god is their stomach, and their glory is in their shame. Their mind is on earthly things.” They would be destroyed by their own sinful passions that controlled their lives. The only thing they would enjoy would be the pleasure of the moment. That was their shameful glory. We discover with Paul that Christians should weep for several reasons for those who are not living for the Lord: 1) Because they are in danger of defeating themselves spiritually and their relationship with God; 2) Because they are going to have to reveal how they lived ungodly lives before the Lord Himself one day; and, 3) Because they harm the cause of Christ! However, Paul reminds his readers, “our citizenship is in heaven.” And, therefore, “we [should] eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ!” Who, when He returns to claim his own, “will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.” Believers should never be loyal to the world and its passions because we are to remember that “this world in its present form is passing away.” (1 Corinthians 7:31) All Christians everywhere know this to be true because it is based squarely on “the power that enables [Jesus] to bring everything under his control!” In fact, the beautiful truth is that “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.” (1 John 1:9) Christians should not stand with the world.

We live in a day and age where 40% of all live births are to single mothers. Sadly, many children will not have the influence of a consistent father figure in their lives. Those that are born into two-parent households, 40% will experience the devastation of divorcing parents. The problem? We are far too selfishly motivated, fond of ourselves, and desire only what is best for us for the moment and do not have our eyes fixed on “the author and perfecter of our faith,” Jesus Christ. Paul teaches us that it is important whose side we are standing on. Paul asks Christians to stand tall with him in the Lord and he related that Christians should not stand with the world.

This article is the copyrighted 2009 © property of Lee Hemen and may not be copied or reproduced in any way shape or form without using the full text of this entire article, and getting the permission of its author.

June 12, 2009

Welcome Back, Carter… Ummm… Obama

Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Welcome Back, Carter
by Ann Coulter

Well, I’m glad that’s over! Now that our silver-tongued president has gone to Cairo to soothe Muslims’ hurt feelings, they love us again! Muslims in Pakistan expressed their appreciation for President Barack Obama’s speech by bombing a fancy hotel in Peshawar this week.

Operating on the liberal premise that what Arabs really respect is weakness, Obama listed, incorrectly, Muslims’ historical contributions to mankind, such as algebra (actually that was the ancient Babylonians), the compass (that was the Chinese), pens (the Chinese again) and medical discoveries (huh?).

But why be picky? All these inventions came in mighty handy on Sept. 11, 2001! Thanks, Muslims!!

Obama bravely told the Cairo audience that 9/11 was a very nasty thing for Muslims to do to us, but on the other hand, they are victims of colonization.

Except we didn’t colonize them. The French and the British did. So why are Arabs flying planes into our buildings and not the Arc de Triomphe? (And gosh, haven’t the Arabs done a lot with the Middle East since the French and the British left!)

In another sharks-to-kittens comparison, Obama said, “Now let me be clear, issues of women’s equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam.” No, he said, “the struggle for women’s equality continues in many aspects of American life.”

So on one hand, 12-year-old girls are stoned to death for the crime of being raped in Muslim countries. But on the other hand, we still don’t have enough female firefighters here in America.

Delusionally, Obama bragged about his multiculti worldview, saying, “I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal.” In Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan and other Muslim countries, women “choose” to cover their heads on pain of losing them.

Obama rolled out the crucial liberal talking point against America’s invasion of Iraq, saying Iraq was a “war of convenience,” while Afghanistan was a “war of necessity.” Liberals cling to this nonsense doggerel as a shield against their hypocrisy on Iraq. Either both wars were wars of necessity or both wars were wars of choice.

Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan — nor any country — attacked us on 9/11. Both Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as many other Muslim countries, were sheltering those associated with the terrorists who did attack us on 9/11 — and who hoped to attack us again.

The truth is, all wars are wars of choice, including the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, both World Wars, the Korean and Vietnam Wars, the Gulf War, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. OK, maybe the war on teen obesity is a war of convenience, but that’s the only one I can think of.

The modern Democrat Party chooses — really chooses, not like Saudi women “choosing” to wear hijabs — to fight no wars. But the Democrats couldn’t say that immediately after 9/11, so they pretended to support the war in Afghanistan and then had to spend the next 7 1/2 years trying to come up with a distinction between Afghanistan and Iraq.

Maybe next they can tell us why fighting Hitler — who never invaded the U.S. and had no plans to do so — was a “necessity” in a way that fighting Saddam wasn’t. (Obama on Hitler: “Nazi ideology sought to subjugate, humiliate and exterminate. It perpetrated murder on a massive scale.” Whereas Saddam Hussein was just messing with the Kuwaitis, Kurds and Shiites.)

Meanwhile, Muslims throughout the Middle East are yearning for their own Saddam Husseins to be taken out by U.S. invaders so they can be liberated, too. (Then we’ll see how many women — outside of an American college campus — “choose” to wear hijabs.) The war-of-choice/war-of-necessity point must be as mystifying to a Muslim audience as a discussion of gay marriage.

Arabs aren’t afraid of us; they’re afraid of Iran. But our aspiring Jimmy Carter had no tough words for Iran. To the contrary, in Cairo, Obama endorsed Iran’s quest for nuclear “power,” while attacking — brace yourself — America for helping remove Iranian loon Mohammad Mossadegh.

The CIA’s taking out Mossadegh was probably the greatest thing that agency ever did. This was back in 1953, before it became a collection of lawyers and paper-pushers.

Mossadegh was as crazy as a March hare (which is really saying something when your competition is Moammar Gadhafi, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Saddam Hussein). He gave interviews lying in bed in pink pajamas. He wept, he fainted, and he set his nation on a path of permanent impoverishment by “nationalizing” the oil wells, where they sat idle after the British companies that knew how to operate them pulled out.

But he was earthy and hated the British, so left-wing academics adored Mossadegh. The New York Times compared him to Thomas Jefferson.

True, Mossadegh had been “elected” by the Iranian parliament — but only in the chaos following the assassination of the sitting prime minister.

In short order, the shah dismissed this clown, but Mossadegh refused to step down, so the CIA forcibly removed him and allowed the shah’s choice to assume the office. This “coup,” as liberal academics term it, was approved by liberals’ favorite Republican president, Dwight Eisenhower, and supported by such ponderous liberal blowhards as John Foster Dulles.

For Obama to be apologizing for one of the CIA’s greatest accomplishments isn’t just crazy, it’s Ramsey Clark crazy.

Obama also said that it was unfair that “some countries have weapons that others do not” and proclaimed that “any nation — including Iran — should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.”

Wait — how about us? If a fanatical holocaust denier with messianic delusions can have nuclear power, can’t the U.S. at least build one nuclear power plant every 30 years?

I’m sure Iran’s compliance will be policed as well as North Korea’s was. Clinton struck a much-heralded “peace deal” with North Korea in 1994, giving them $4 billion to construct nuclear facilities and 500,000 tons of fuel oil in return for a promise that they wouldn’t build nuclear weapons. The ink wasn’t dry before the North Koreans began feverishly building nukes.

But back to Iran, what precisely do Iranians need nuclear power for, again? They’re not exactly a manufacturing powerhouse. Iran is a primitive nation in the middle of a desert that happens to sit on top of a large percentage of the world’s oil and gas reserves. That’s not enough oil and gas to run household fans?

Obama’s “I’m OK, You’re OK” speech would be hilarious, if it weren’t so terrifying.

June 11, 2009

Holocaust Museum Shooter: Christian-Hating Socialist

Holocaust Museum Shooter: Christian-Hating Socialist
By: Ben Johnson
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, June 11, 2009

On June 10, the nation tragically witnessed a memorial dedicated to commemorating an atrocity become the site of yet more death. Just before 1 p.m., longtime neo-Nazi James Wenneker Von Brunn entered the Holocaust Museum on the National Mall and opened fire in an attempt to complete the Final Solution his hero had left tentative, an omission Von Brunn dubbed “Hitler’s biggest mistake.” As former Defense Secretary Bill Cohen wandered the museum grounds, Von Brunn killed Stephen T. Johns, a black security officer, then was shot himself. As of this writing, the 88-year-old is in critical condition.

The white-wing fringe greeted the news with predictable joy. Its most popular website, Stormfront.org, saluted “White Racialist Treasure: James Von Brunn” in 2004; a thoughtful reader, seeing Von Brunn had backed up his recent threats with deadly action, wrote yesterday, “Definitely needs a bump today.” Another hoped the shooting would cause Americans to believe taking their children to Holocaust memorials is now “an insurance risk.”

Yet racists are not alone in their glee. Leftists have decided to exploit Von Brunn’s madness to engender fear of rampant conservative terrorism. They overlook one point: the shooter was not a conservative.

A review of his lengthy associations reveals Von Brunn hardly fits the stereotype of a Religious Right, GOP precinct captain. He denounced the Christian faith as a dastardly Jewish conspiracy, a “HOAX” invented by the Apostle Paul to “DESTROY ROMAN CULTURE” from within by undermining its pagan virility. (All screaming capitalization and grammatical errors in this piece appear in the original.) Like others on the racist fringe, the shooter proclaimed clearly: “SOCIALISM, represents the future of the West.”

Karl Rove, Glenn Beck, and Freepers Killed Stephen Johns?

Never apt to let facts get in the way of slander, the Left immediately branded Von Brunn a conservative – and found a way to tie his actions to their favorite demons: President Bush and Fox News. Upon learning of the tragedy, Huffington Post blogger Michelle Kraus wrote simply, “Thank you very much Karl Rove and your minions.” Fellow HuffenPuffer Joseph Palermo, – also, surprise, an Associate Professor of History at California State University-Sacramento – accused Fox News host Glenn Beck of “using the public airwaves to incite violence,” calling his program “a white reactionary tour de force – incendiary, stupid, and racist.” The usually staid Alan Colmes smeared the mainstream conservative website FreeRepublic.com, an attack quickly recycled by a ThinkProgress.org reader, who added this sterling political analysis: “There isn’t really a line drawn between the right wing ‘base’ and neo-Nazis any more. It’s a single continuum, and freepers is right there in that gray area.”

Meanwhile, more significant voices joined in. Michael Tomasky, editor of Guardian America, the U.S. affiliate of Britain’s widely read socialist newspaper The Guardian, immediately seized upon the shooting to bludgeon American conservatives. In a blog entitled, “Will They Call Him Terrorist?” Tomasky wrote: “So this is the second act of right-wing terror, the first being the murder of Dr. Tiller, in a mere three weeks. These are terrorists, as surely as Zawahiri is. Will Rush Limbaugh and the other demagogues like him call them that?” He went on to call Rush “Oxyboy” and closed: “All right my British friends. Your turn to sneer again. But let’s all say a prayer for the victims of this craziness and their loved ones first.”

The “mainstream” media quickly went into overload. CNN’s Anderson Cooper interviewed Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center, who insisted: “This is a real movement out there. This is not just the fringe-of-the-fringe.” He did not square this with his assessment minutes earlier that there were, at best, 100-200,000 white supremacists in the country and only “a tiny slither” would commit violent acts.[1] MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann denounced “the environment” that produced “two acts of right-wing violence.”[2] (Another HuffPo blogger described a Black Muslim’s shooting of a military recruiter in Arkansas and a Muslim terror cell’s plot to blow up Bronx synagogues as “right-wing” phenomena.) Rachel Maddow insisted, “within two weeks we’ve seen two shootings…when the shooter was clearly motivated by extreme right-wing views.”

All have seized on the shooting in an attempt to salvage the reputation of Janet Napolitano, claiming the two (or four) eruptions confirm the Department of Homeland Security’s retracted assertion “that lone wolves and small terrorist cells embracing violent right-wing extremist ideology are the most dangerous domestic terrorism threat in the United States.” No one can deny Von Brunn’s danger, but neither should anyone be confused about his collectivist history and deeply held totalitarian ideology.

Von Brunn’s Letter to Jim Webb

Yesterday’s attack was Von Brunner’s second attempted strike. Police arrested him on December 7, 1981, after they found him prowling the Washington, D.C., offices of the Federal Reserve Bank posing as a journalist. Inside a bag slumped over his shoulder, they discovered a handgun, a shotgun, and a knife, which he claimed he would use to place then-Fed Chairman Paul Volcker under citizens’ arrest.[3] After being convicted, he tried to obtain help by contacting then-Admiral Jim Webb, now a Democratic U.S. Senator from Virginia, but Von Brunn claimed the postmaster “purloined” the letter. The New York Daily News reports after his release in 1989, Von Brunner “worked at a bookstore run by a Holocaust-denying group called the Institute of Historical Review,” then lived in Hayden Lake, Idaho – then the headquarters of the Aryan Nations.[4]

At some point, he settled in the Maryland area and decided to jump into the publishing game himself.

His Own Words: Not Newsworthy

Von Brunn’s motivation leaps off every page of his self-published “book,” Kill the Best Gentiles, a title supposedly derived from secret Jewish instructions to slaughter the goyim. (You can download the first six chapters here.) Remarkably, his words have received little scrutiny, likely because of what they establish: the “right-wing terrorist” of the Holocaust Museum is an anti-religious socialist.

Somehow in its five-page excerpt of Von Brunn’s book, Salon did not find these quotations. I have chosen to reproduce enough of his writings to demonstrate they are not being taken out of context.

Hate Jews, Hate the Jewish Messiah

Although the hate crimes industry lumps neo-Nazis and White Nationalists in with the “Religious Right” – and occasionally, FrontPage Magazine, the better to smear you with – few Americans realize the true believers are not merely non-Christian but anti-Christian. Like their predecessors, they trace Aryan downfall to “culture distorters” (guess who?) – and among the largest “distortion” is the replacement of warlike Germanic gods with Jesus Christ, the Messiah promised by the Jewish Scriptures. Von Brunn dedicated Kill the Best Gentiles to the late professor Revilo P. Oliver. Typical of Nazis, past and present, Oliver branded Christianity a “Jewish cult” and “spiritual syphilis.” Brunn’s follows suit. He shuns the words of the Bible, exhorting his readers: “Remember, these delusions of grandeur were written by HEBREWS about themselves. Megalomaniacs of such magnitude generally are manic-depressives confined to insane asylums.” (p. 31.) His distaste for their Deity could hardly be more evident:

JEHOVAH, like Alley Oop, says whatever the scriptwriters print in the blurbs. Those who find it compelling to believe Yahweh created a flat earth, circa 5000 B.C., spoke from a burning bush, bared his buttocks, parted the Red Sea, and loves JEWS above all other nations, share a childish credulity with those who believe millions of JEWS died in German gas-chambers. It also confirms JEWISH conviction that Gentiles are stupid sheep. It makes one want to puke. (p. 32.)

Having vilified the Father, he turns his focus to the Son. “Jesus (if he did exist),” Von Brunn wrote, “was born in Galilee (‘Unclean Land of the Gentiles’).” (p. 57.) In a post on the appropriately named website Antichrist.net, Von Brunn expanded on the reason Saul of Tarsus, a former rabbi, would become the chief apostle of this religion to the Gentiles:

Saul — a Roman citizen — suddenly realized how he could destroy Rome!  Saul trembled uncontrollably with fear and joy.  He would simply promulgate the insane teachings of Jesus!  What better way to destroy a Nation — any Nation — than to undermine her hubris; her gods, ethics, mores, history, her gene-pool — in short, Saul would DESTROY ROMAN CULTURE.  Then, as night follows day, with her foundations rotted, the Roman Empire would FALL.  Saul decided to begin the HOAX by inventing a miraculous encounter on the road to Damascus with the reincarnated Jesus the Christ!

Toward that end — no different than Hollywood script-writers today — Saul created a bogus a la Spielberg docu-drama stuffed with lies, miracles, guilt trips, betrayal, virgin birth, eternal damnation, salvation — a scenario appealing to the superstitious, vulnerable, ignorant yearning sheep — he named his hoax “Christianity.” …

The Gospels profess that only Christians may enter Yahweh’s Kingdom of Heaven.  To qualify, among other demands, Christians must LOVE THEIR ENEMIES (Jews); give away their personal belongings; eschew knowledge; judge not, despise nature, abandon earthly pleasures, acknowledge that all YHWH’s children are equal; and above all else worship YHWH, the jealous, wrathful, vengeful, unforgiving, genocidal, anthropomorphic tribal god (Jesus’ father) created by Hebrews in their image and likeness….The Big Lie technique, employed by Paul to create the CHRISTIAN RELIGION, also was used to create the HOLOCAUST RELIGION … CHRISTIANITY AND THE HOLOCAUST are HOAXES.

“Christianity” destroyed Roman Civilization.  The “Holocaust” Religion is destroying Western Civilization.  The Aryan gene-pool dies, “unwept, unhonored and unsung.”

This assessment seems unlikely to stem from Rush Limbaugh (raised Lutheran), Glenn Beck (converted to Mormonism), or Karl Rove (a Presbyterian accused of agnosticism). So, too, are his unexamined statist economic beliefs.

Socialism: “The Future of the West”

If Von Brunn shared the anti-Christian hatred expressed by Revilo Oliver, he accepted the collectivist, socialist views of Francis Parker Yockey, a guiding light and philosopher of fascism unafraid of aligning with Third World socialists. Francis Parker Yockey’s magnum opus,the 600+ page Imperium, is among the books most beloved by Willis Carto – who founded the “bookstore” that employed Von Brunn following his prison release – and Carto continues to proffer it a foundational text for the philosophically pretentious fascist. Yockey wrote, “The 19th century was the age of Individualism; the 20th and 21st are the ages of Socialism.” Sounding like a Marxist determinist he wrote, “Destiny is irreversible, and the Spirit of Socialism, with its latent Resurgence of Authority and its youthful will-to-power moved steadily forward.”  Yockey faulted “Capitalistic thinkers” who “found no ethical fault with destruction of groups and individuals” – that is, races – “by other groups and individuals, so long as the criminal law was not infringed.” In his mind, “The alternative to Socialism was not Capitalism, but chaos.”

Von Brunn proved in Kill the Best Gentiles that he learned well:

Yockey, in his suppressed book Imperium, notes that MARXISM is seriously flawed because MARX, being a JEW, could not understand the real differences between CAPITALISM and SOCIALISM, which emanated from the WESTERN CULTURE-ORGANISM. Capitalism and Socialism are how a Nation (Family, People, Race) feels, thinks, and lives, and secondarily are ECONOMIC CONCEPTS. One [capitalism] is past history; the other, WESTERN SOCIALISM, represents the future of the West, and the end of JEWRY on Western soil.

The Age of Reason produced CAPITALISM in the West, the IDEA of rugged individualism: “Every Man for Himself.” Freedom from authority: “Don’t tread on me!” At the same time, paradoxically, it was understood, that these rugged individuals should act in the best interest of the Nation-State. To the West ECONOMIC CAPITALISM meant: free trade, no personal income-tax, no state interference in money matters, private ownership, etc. USURY, however, was relegated outside the Pale, and proscribed. Capitalists found no fault with economically defeating, within the law, opposing economic groups. That was considered “healthy competition.” European States, goaded by Bankers, also competed with one another. Often with disastrous results. During WWI it became painfully clear that the IDEA of “rugged individualism” worked against the ARYAN NATION and its individual States.

WESTERN SOCIALISM, unlike Marxism/Communism and Capitalism, emanates not from Reason alone but from the ETHOS OF THE WEST. It expresses the instinctive and Intuitive feelings UNIQUE to the Aryan Nation. Its Idea is the Musketeers’ cry: “One for All and All for One!” The ingathering of the White Nation-States into ONE CULTURAL ORGANISM — its own territory and its own State in which to house, protect, and nurture the Nation — precludes Marxist inspired class warfare and hate-struggles between its component parts. The ECONOMY springs from the CULTURE. MONEY becomes merely a tool, a means of exchange, a storage of value — not an ILLUMINATI weapon.” (pp. 143-4). “No intelligent person took MARX seriously. His Old Testament idea that work is evil — and New Testament idea that men and races are equally endowed — opposes Nature and the very Soul of the West.” Marxists, Bolsheviks, Communists denounce “capitalist pigs.” While from behind the scenes — in the on-going battle to implement the PROTOCOLS OF ZION — all wars and revolutions are financed by JEW CAPITALISTS. (pp. 143-5.)

He, too, despised the freedom and potential decadence capitalism affords, insisting Jews were “exacerbating natural disputes between theWestern States and influencing the results in favor of Liberalism as opposed to Authority; that is, materialism, free trade and usury, as opposed to Western Socialism; Internationalism as opposed to Western unity. MONEY was their sword and buckler. Hate and revenge their motif.” (pp. 109-110.)

The nexus of this capitalist plot is…the Federal Reserve Board. Although his website is currently down, the shooter’s account of his 1981 arrest at the Fed states, “The U.S. President, with approval of the Senate, appoints the FED Board of Governors. The majority of them are Wall Street denizens…After all, the FED was designed by bankers for bankers.” (Emphasis in original.) Such sentiments could appear easily on DailyKos or CounterPunch.

That is not without reason. Von Brunn’s association with Willis Carto’s “bookstore” make it undeniable his anti-conservative views were influenced by the far-Left.

Nazis for Chomsky and Land Reform

The “bookstore” that employed the museum shooter was Noontide Press, the brainchild of Willis Carto, often named the most influential anti-Semite in the country. In addition to Holocaust denial material and conspiracy theories, the firm printed and peddled left-of-center volumes by more conspicuous figures, among them the most cited academic in the United States. In the 1980s, Noontide published Noam Chomsky’s book The Fateful Triangle. Chomsky became a hero of Jew-haters for his quasi-conspiratorial views of American society, his defense of Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson, and his distaste for Israel. Noontide’s catalog once carried a number of Chomsky materials out of appreciation. Alongside the linguist on Noontide’s roster stood far-leftist Holly Sklar’s volume Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management and the lecture Palestinian writer and centenarian Sami Hadawi delivered to the IHR entitled, “Who Are the Palestinians?”[5] Noontide also publishes statist works of bygone days, including Gen. Smedley Butler’s “War is a Racket,” a Nye Commission-era screed blaming war on capitalist “war merchants.” One perusing its catalog may also find, for example, reprints works of Depression-era “radio priest” and Nazi plagiarist Fr. Charles Coughlin (whose rallying cry was “A Just and Living Wage”) and his contemporary, fascist theorist Lawrence Dennis (among whose works is Is Capitalism Doomed?).[6]

These writings could scarcely resemble the words of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, or Karl Rove less.

Neither could his association with the Aryan Nations. As many authors have shown, fascism is a totalitarian ideology concentrating all power in the hands of the State and thus not a conservative ideology but a creature of the Left. This holds true in the present as well as the past. The AN’s “Platform for the Aryan National State” includes these collectivist provisions (all quoted):

  • Promote and preserve the industry and livelihood of the citizens.
  • [E]liminate the current practice of damaging and poisoning life and environment.
  • Provide honest aid to farmers and other business people, and shall restore to all citizens rightful land ownership.
  • Make the necessary provisions for the aged, who have been impoverished by fraud (inflation).
  • Confiscate all unearned wealth, stolen by fraud or usury and that which is gain from war.
  • Nationalize all monopolies and multi-national interest[s].
  • Immediately bring about land reform….

The ideology of Von Brunn and his contemporaries does not comport in any way with conservatism. Yet the Left chose to exploit the death of a black man as a paraphrase of Rahm Emanuel’s dictum; they never let a tragedy go to waste. President Clinton blamed the Oklahoma City Bombing on Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich; leftists hinted George Bush caused Sen. Paul Wellstone’s plane crash; Cindy Sheehan become a momentary folk hero by championing a cause her slain son opposed; and some managed to muffle their glee over President Reagan’s affliction with Alzheimer’s Disease just long enough to call for public funding of embryonic stem cell research.

One can expect no more decency when a self-proclaimed socialist murders a minority in cold blood in a shrine to one of collectivism’s most shameful accomplishments.

ENDNOTES:

1. An exact count of potential White Nationalist terrorists, obviously impossible, is rendered more difficult by the concept of “leaderless resistance” propounded by Louis Beam, formerly one of the FBI’s ten most wanted.

2. Surprisingly, his guest, Jack Levin the author of Domestic Terrorism, discussed “the new anti-Semitism of the Progressive Left.”

3.The Fed fixation is common among conspiracy theorists, who believe the Jews control the U.S. economy through the machinations of this “privately owned” enterprise. They believe Woodrow Wilson privatized the Fed in 1913 and now wish to nationalize it, placing it directly under Congressional rule. Politicized money is hardly a conservative goal.

The Institute for Historical Review (IHR) was then run by reclusive anti-Semite Willis Carto, the founder of Liberty Lobby and publisher of the most widely circulated hate publication in the United States (originally call THE SPOTLIGHT since rebranded American Free Press). Carto, who briefly revived The Populist Party, is considered the most influential Jew-hater in the United States.

4. After losing a lawsuit, the Aryan Nations lost its land. Following the death of founder Richard Girnt Butler, the organization has split in two.

5. Contrary to the website, the IHR has offered the lecture for years. It is available for download here.

6. Lawrence Dennis is not without his admirers on the fringe today. Dennis “Justin” Raimondo wrote a glowing piece for TakiMag calling him a “prophetic voice” and another for Antiwar.com, saying “his legacy will enrich a conservative movement that is just beginning to rediscover its Old Right Heritage – and his example will inspire a new generation of the antiwar movement that sees itself as neither Left nor Right but plain and simply American.” Lawrence has also been the subject of a two-page write-up in THE SPOTLIGHT.

June 9, 2009

Do You Agree With Robert Knight, that Obama has A Low View of Christianity?

Obama Nation’s Low View of Christianity
by Robert Knight

President Obama’s comment to French television on June 1 that the United States is “one of the largest Muslim countries in the world,” plus his Islam-praising speech in Cairo, Egypt on June 4, raise anew questions about his own faith and how he views America.

Questions can also be asked about his math. The CIA Factbook estimates America’s Muslim population at 0.6 percent, or about 1.8 million, which puts it in 58th place among nations’ total Muslim populations. Even if you take the Islamic Information Center’s high estimate of 8 million, that still puts the U.S. at 29th out of 60 nations.

In Cairo, Obama quoted from the Koran, used his middle name of Hussein, and indicated that the United States and Muslim nations have the same commitment to tolerance and freedom. To fathom the absurdity, think about the possibility of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution springing from the pens of Islamic scholars Thomas al-Jefferson and James al-Madison.

Over the past three years, Obama has made it his business to insist that “we are no longer a Christian nation.”  He has said it in many places, here and abroad. In 2006, in Washington, D.C., he said, “Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation. At least, not just.” He posted the same sentiment on his campaign website.

At the Compassion Forum at Messiah College in Pennsylvania on April 13, 2008, he said, “We are not just a Christian nation. We are a Jewish nation; we are a Buddhist nation; we are a Muslim nation; Hindu nation; and we are a nation of atheists and nonbelievers.”

In Turkey, at a press conference on April 10, he said:  “Although we have a large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values. I think modern Turkey was founded with a similar set of values.”

During the presidential campaign, the media pounced on anyone who inquired into Obama’s Muslim upbringing in Indonesia, his two Muslim fathers or his later 20-year attendance at radical pastor Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. Now, his Muslim roots are touted as an asset.

No one can say for sure what Obama actually believes, since only God can know the human heart. So we are left examining his words and actions. 

The media-enforced line for the past three years has been that he is a self-described mainstream Christian, end of story. Even when Obama badly distorted Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount into a clarion call to accept homosexuality, the press yawned. They yawned (or cheered) when he mocked the Bible’s relevance for politics in that 2006 Washington, D.C. speech:

“Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is okay? Or we could go with Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith, or should we just stick with the Sermon on the Mount, a passage which is so radical that it’s doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application. Folks haven’t been reading the Bible.”

More cheers came when he spoke the language of unity while taking a shot at his political opponents during a speech at the United Church of Christ convention in 2007:

“Somehow, somewhere along the way, faith stopped being used to bring us together and started being used to drive us apart. It got hijacked. Part of it’s because of the so-called leaders of the Christian Right, who’ve been all too eager to exploit what divides us.

“We can recognize the truth that’s at the heart of the UCC: that the conversation is not over [God needs an editor]; that our roles are not defined [men in dresses, unite]; that through ancient texts and modern voices, God is still speaking [yes, we’re ripping out pages of the Bible daily to suit our appetites], challenging us to change not just our own lives, but the world around us …hate has no place in the hearts of believers.”

Is it not hateful to suggest that people who disagree with you are full of “hate?” Is it unifying to accuse opponents of inventing fights that they didn’t start? 

More odd things have been happening since Obama’s election that should give pause to even the most cynical observers.

On the Saturday before Obama’s swearing-in, V. Gene Robinson, the openly homosexual Episcopal bishop of New Hampshire, gave an invocation at a pre-inaugural event at the Lincoln Memorial. The New York Times interviewed him beforehand:

“Bishop Robinson said he had been rereading inaugural prayers through history and was ‘horrified’ at how ‘specifically and aggressively Christian they were.’ Bishop Robinson said, ‘I am very clear that this will not be a Christian prayer, and I won’t be quoting Scripture or anything like that. The texts that I hold as sacred are not sacred texts for all Americans, and I want all people to feel that this is their prayer.’”

As one of his first judicial appointments, Obama named Indiana federal judge David Hamilton to the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Hamilton, who had ruled that a pastor could not invoke the name of Jesus in an opening prayer for the Indiana legislature, said that, on the other hand, invoking Allah at a public event is fine.

In April, it was reported that Obama appointed Harry Knox, a Catholic-bashing homosexual activist, to the Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Knox, who directs the religion program at the largest gay pressure group, the Human Rights Campaign, described Pope Benedict and other Catholic clergy as “discredited leaders” because of their stand for traditional marriage, and called the Knights of Columbus “foot soldiers of a discredited army of oppression” because of their  support of California’s Proposition 8 marriage amendment.

On April 14, 2009, the Obama team had Georgetown University cover up the Greek letters IHS, which stand for Jesus, so they would not show up when he spoke in front of them.

On May 7, Obama declined to hold any White House event to mark the National Day of Prayer, a decision hailed by Barry Lynn’s hard left Americans United for the Separation of Church and State.

In his eloquent commencement speech at Notre Dame on May 17, Obama sounded a conciliatory note, lamented, sort of, the abortions that he wants taxpayers to fund, and gave more clues that Christianity will move over and shrink before a universalist moral relativism:

“The size and scope of the challenges before us require that we remake [not “reform” or “restore,” but “remake”] our world to renew its promise; that we align our deepest values and commitments to the demands of a new age.

“Your generation must decide how to save God’s creation from a changing climate that threatens to destroy it…..  And we must find a way to reconcile our ever-shrinking world with its ever-growing diversity — diversity of thought, diversity of culture, and diversity of belief.”

If diversity in and of itself is god, where does that leave Jesus Christ – the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, the Alpha and the Omega, the Way, the Truth and the Life, through Whom all things were created?

Well, the Obama Nation might just ask Him to change his name to  … Allah.

June 7, 2009

Press On Toward the Prize! – Philippians 3:13-16

Press On Toward the Prize! – Philippians 3:13-16
By Pastor Lee Hemen
June 7, 2009 AM

Remember the movie called The Fugitive? “It is about a Dr. Richard Kimble, played by Harrison Ford, who is a successful vascular surgeon in Chicago. He comes home one night to find his wife Helen fatally wounded by a man with a prosthetic arm. He attempts to subdue the killer, but the man escapes. The lack of evidence of a break-in, his fingerprints being found on the gun and the bullets, and Helen’s misunderstood 9-11 call lead the Chicago police to charge Kimble with murder; and he is sentenced to death by lethal injection.” (Wikipedia)

On the way to death row, via a prison bus, the other prisoners attempt an escape causing the bus to fall into the path of an oncoming train. Kimble barely escapes the bus’ destruction and flees into the night. And then begins his flight from US Marshals and the pursuit of the real killer of his wife.

It is the single-mindedness of both the protagonist and the antagonist that makes this movie the hit it was. It is a great depiction of being in pursuit of a goal. Both Kimble and the US Marshal Samuel Gerard, played by Tommy Lee Jones, that is hunting him have a singular, yet differing, objective in mind. So much so that both are willing to do whatever it takes to obtain the objective they are going all out for. In one great scene that reflects this is when Kimble is cornered by Gerard and proclaims, “I’m innocent.” Gerard retorts, “I don’t care.”

In our world there are those who are willing to risk everything just to obtain that which they consider most precious in life. For some it is education, for others it is politics, still others it is fame or fortune. What do you cherish in life so much that you are willing to risk everything to obtain it?

“In the television series The West Wing, fictional President Josiah Bartlet regularly ended staff meetings with two words—‘What’s next?’ It was his way of signaling that he was finished with the issue at hand and ready to move on to other concerns. The pressures and responsibilities of life in the White House demanded that he not focus on what was in the rear-view mirror—he needed to keep his eyes ahead, moving forward to what was next.” (RBC – Bill Crowder) Do you live your life this way? What is your focus in life? Do you dwell so much on the past that you cannot go forward?

We discover in his letter to the Philippians that Paul describes for us two ways we are to view our lives in Jesus Christ. What Paul wanted the Philippians to realize is the spiritual truth that what they once thought as important in life was no longer so and their goal in life had now changed because of their faith in the Lord. This is true for us in our day and age as well. There are many folks who “press on to win the prize,” but few truly realize what that means or what the prize is they should press on toward! Therefore, let’s discover what Paul says about what it means to press on toward the prize.

Paul wrote: “Brothers, I do not consider myself yet to have taken hold of it. But one thing I do: Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus. All of us who are mature should take such a view of things. And if on some point you think differently, that too God will make clear to you. Only let us live up to what we have already attained.” (Philippians 3:13-16 NIV)

First, we discover that Paul had a singular life goal. This goal affected everything that Paul did in his life. He saw it as an over-riding objective that made everything else in his life subservient to it. Nothing else in Paul’s life took the priority of this goal. What was this goal of Paul’s that took on such importance for him? It was “the goal to win the prize for which God [had] called [Paul] heavenward.” The NASB translates it: “I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus,” and the King James states: “I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.” Like the writer of Hebrews, Paul knew all Christians are “partakers of the heavenly calling.” (Hebrews 3:1) Nothing in life is more import for the believer than this “high calling.” Paul would write, “I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings.” (1 Corinthians 9:23) Therefore, Christians should “Run in such a way as to get the prize.” (1 Corinthians 9:24) Like a prize athlete who wants to win first place, Paul uses language to encourage his fellow Christians to press on to win the prize and he was willing to risk everything to obtain it. It should be the believer’s singular goal in life.

When I was a child my goal in life was to play and I did a good job of it. After becoming a teenager, my priority in life changed to the opposite sex, and few of us want to relive some of those trials and tribulations. Then, as I became an adult, I soon realized that there was more in life. Life’s fulfillment was more than marriage, being a parent, or obtaining things. I realized that life was eternal and its focus should reflect it. Like Paul who reflected on his life in this way: “When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me.” (1 Corinthians 13:11) Paul now had a singular goal in life. All Christians should. We are to press on toward the prize.

Secondly, Paul never looked back. He knew that looking back for the believer was a waste of time. If the believer is fully cleansed by the blood of Christ when they believe there is no reason to look back and rehash old sins. This is why Paul wrote “But one thing I do: Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead… .” Looking back and rehashing past sins for Paul never entered his mind. Jesus had related that “No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for service in the kingdom of God.” (Luke 9:62) If we look back we often tend to go back to our old way of life. Jesus would also admonish: “Remember Lot’s wife! Whoever tries to keep his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life will preserve it.” (Luke 17:32-33) The Christian has more reason to look forward rather than in the rearview mirror. This is why Paul warned the Ephesians, “You were taught, with regard to your former way of life, to put off your old self, which is being corrupted by its deceitful desires; to be made new in the attitude of your minds; and to put on the new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness.” (Ephesians 4:22-24) Paul knew “that our old self was crucified with him so that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin… .” (Romans 6:6) Looking back and remembering your old way of life only leads to longing for that old way of life. For the Christian, that way of life is dead: “I have been crucified with Christ,” Paul reminds us, “and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.” (Galatians 2:20) Paul never looked back but pressed on to win the prize.

One of the things I loved to do as a child was to sit and listen to my parents and grandparents talk about their childhood. Families often did that sort of thing when I was a boy. They would sit around and talk about their history and their past and what it was like way back when. Today’s society is not so interested in remembering the “good old days,” or if they do, they remember only the good things about the “good old days.” We want to forget about the epidemics of influenza, measles, polo, or typhoid that killed hundreds of thousands, if not millions. We forget that many did not have indoor plumbing, medical or dental like we do now, or even own their own car or home! Some of the good old things about the good old days are not worth remembering. Sin, in the life of someone who has placed their faith in Christ, should not be rehashed in the life of a believer either. Paul never looked back, but pressed on to win the prize. In fact, he retorted, “All of us who are mature should take such a view of things. And if on some point you think differently, that too God will make clear to you. Only let us live up to what we have already attained.”

Now, let me ask you a question: ”Are you living your life like a fugitive?” Not one that is single-minded and going for a goal of finding, say a murderer, but rather one that keeps looking back over past sins? Paul did not live his life as a fugitive but as one who had a singular goal in life and one that never looked back. He could live this way because Paul had trusted Jesus Christ with his life. Have you?

This article is the copyrighted 2009 © property of Lee Hemen and may not be copied or reproduced in any way shape or form without using the full text of this entire article, and getting the permission of its author.

May 31, 2009

What is Truly Important in Life? – Philippians 3:10-12

What is Truly Important in Life? – Philippians 3:10-12
By Pastor Lee Hemen
May 31, 2009 AM

Mike Hayes an award-winning NYC radio producer wrote about how his life priorities were changed suddenly in his Senior year of college. He wrote that “During my junior year in college, I ran myself ragged…. I had two roommates that year, Scott and Dave. Scott was a giant, about 6’ 4” and 200 pounds of solid muscle…. Dave was the polar opposite. About 5’ 7” and maybe 100 pounds. Dave was plagued by diabetes and a heart condition. He had to closely monitor his diet, and he added about six or seven pills to his daily regimen of food as well.” Mike’s relationship with God suffered as much as his relationship with his friends. His “wake-up call came the next year.” “I had moved into a new residence hall with other friends… I got the call from Dave’s new roommate… Dave was headed to the hospital. ‘Something with his heart.’ It didn’t look good.” Dave was dying yet he was only 20 years old. Dave’s one chance was a heart defibrillator. Sitting with friends, waiting for Dave’s surgery, Mike began to realize all the time he had missed with his friend Dave and how much he needed God back in his life again.

He writes, “I was a better person when I graduated later that year. I was better for the friendships I had made with these men and women who had banded together to support their friend in his time of need…. I never let him become so distant from me again. During the last five years of Dave’s life, I attended his block party every year, and there wasn’t a Super Bowl that I didn’t watch in his basement. Dave died December 8, 1995. He was only 25. I thank God for those last five years…. Every year, I take December 8 off from work. I use that day to tell those around me how much I love them and how my life would be worse if it wasn’t for their presence.” What is truly important in life for you?

Paul writes, “I want to know Christ and the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of sharing in his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, and so, somehow, to attain to the resurrection from the dead. Not that I have already obtained all this, or have already been made perfect, but I press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me.” (Philippians 3:10-12) Paul had discovered what was truly important in life and he shares with us the three things he had discovered.

First, Paul wanted to “know Christ and the power of his resurrection!” Here is an open and honest confession to the Philippians of the Apostle for us to read. Paul had already trusted his life to Christ. He had placed his faith in Jesus, but now Paul was sharing that he desired above all to “know Christ.” He literally wanted to know Jesus by experiencing Him fully in his life. Remember, back in verse 8, he had written: “I consider everything a loss compared to the surpassing greatness of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whose sake I have lost all things!” For Paul it was more than a feeling or a head knowledge of God or of Jesus. It was the intimate “power of [Jesus’] resurrection” that would change Paul’s entire way of thinking and living! It is this power that brought Jesus back to life that operates in the life of every believer because they have “been raised with Christ!” (Colossians 3:1) To fully know Jesus is to fully know the power of His resurrection. The idea is one of overcoming resistance. For Paul that resistance was anything that kept him from fully knowing Jesus. His life no longer depended upon following a set of rules and regulations, but was instead empowered by faith. Paul would declare: “I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.” (Galatians 2:20) Do you want to know Christ and the power of His resurrection? What is truly important in life for you?

Secondly, Paul wanted to know “the fellowship of sharing in [Jesus’] sufferings, becoming like him in his death!” These “sufferings” Paul mentions were not Christ’s sufferings on the cross. He did not want to submit himself to some weird cultic self-abasement or flagellation. Paul knew that the suffering of Jesus on the cross could not be shared or duplicated. They were Jesus’ alone to endure. Remember, Jesus “humbled himself and became obedient to death— even death on a cross!” (Philippians 2:8) But Paul did desire to participate with Christ, since he was one of His, in suffering for the sake of the gospel. At the very beginning of Paul’s journey with the Lord, Ananias had told Paul what God had said to him concerning Paul’s life: “I will show him how much he must suffer for my name.” (Acts 9:16) And throughout the Apostle’s life he had indeed suffered for the sake of the gospel: “Five times I received from the Jews the forty lashes minus one. Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, I spent a night and a day in the open sea, I have been constantly on the move. I have been in danger from rivers, in danger from bandits, in danger from my own countrymen, in danger from Gentiles; in danger in the city, in danger in the country, in danger at sea; and in danger from false brothers. I have labored and toiled and have often gone without sleep; I have known hunger and thirst and have often gone without food; I have been cold and naked.” (2 Corinthians 11:24-27) Paul realized that Christians “always carry around in our body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body.” (2 Corinthians 4:10) Paul was not some sadomasochist, he was a willing follower of Jesus who willingly gave himself over to “the fellowship of sharing in [Jesus’] sufferings, becoming like him in his death!” The words “becoming like Him” translate to “being conformed inwardly in one’s experience to something.” As Christ died for sin, so a believer has died to sin: “For we know that our old self was crucified with him so that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin–because anyone who has died has been freed from sin.” (Romans 6:6-7) In fact the word here for “resurrection” is used nowhere else in the New Testament. It literally means an “out-resurrection.” Paul wanted folks to see Jesus when they saw his life. Paul became like Jesus when he died to himself and let the world see Jesus. That was his “out-resurrection”! What is truly important in life for you?

Finally, Paul realized that he had not “obtained all this, or have already been made perfect, but I press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me.” Paul knew he had not arrived: “Not that I have already obtained all this.” He knew he had to walk further with the Lord, and Paul also knew that he had not “been made perfect.” He had a ways to go! However, Paul pursued his life in Jesus like a long distance runner going for the goal. He saw his life as beginning when he met Jesus on the road to Damascus and it now stretched out before him to the finish. He could not see all the obstacles, hardships, or what might occur in his life, but he certainly saw the finish line. Paul ran for the goal: “I press on to take hold of that for which Christ Jesus took hold of me.” The goal of every Christian is to head for the finish line. Some have already finished the race, others are near its end, but many of us our far from the final ribbon. Along the way Jesus gives us water for our thirst and sustenance for our downcast souls. We can rest beside the still waters and picnic in the green pastures, but we to never forget to get up and get going to finish the race that God has called us to.

Psalm 112:6 states that “the righteous man will be remembered forever.” David H. Roper notes that “One reason we’re left here on earth and not taken to heaven immediately after trusting in Christ for salvation is that God has work for us to do. ‘Man is immortal,’ Augustine said, ‘until his work is done.’

The time of our death is not determined by anyone or anything here on earth. That decision is made in the councils of heaven. When we have done all that God has in mind for us to do, then and only then will He take us home—and not one second before. As Paul put it, ‘David, after he had served his own generation by the will of God, fell asleep’ (Acts 13:36).

In the meantime, until God takes us home, there’s plenty to do. ‘I must work the works of Him who sent Me while it is day,’ Jesus said. ‘Night is coming when no one can work’ (John 9:4). Night is coming when we will once for all close our eyes on this world, or our Lord will return to take us to be with Him. Each day brings that time a little closer. As long as we have the light of day, we must work—not to conquer, acquire, accumulate, and retire, but to make visible the invisible Christ by touching people with His love.” What is truly important in life for you?

This article is the copyrighted 2009 © property of Lee Hemen and may not be copied or reproduced in any way shape or form without using the full text of this entire article, and getting the permission of its author.

May 29, 2009

The Truth About ObamACORN

Friday, May 29, 2009
Michelle Malkin: Townhall.com Columnist
The Truth About ObamACORN
by Michelle Malkin

Left-wing groups in Washington, D.C., are panicked. The New York Times and other Team Obama whitewashers are downplaying the connection between the Obama presidential campaign, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and Obama’s old employer Project Vote (ACORN’s nonprofit canvassing arm). Alas, the truth keeps seeping out.

At a closed-door powwow hosted Thursday at the left-leaning Center for American Progress, activists discussed how to combat a relentless stream of corruption charges from ACORN/Project Vote whistleblowers. But it’s too late for a reputation bailout. Former Project Vote official and whistleblower Anita MonCrief has harnessed the Internet to crowd-source a massive cache of documents showing ties between Obama staff members and the supposedly “nonpartisan” ACORN operations.

Last fall, The New York Times abandoned an investigation into whether Obama had shared donor lists with Project Vote, a 501(c)(3) organization that is prohibited from engaging in political activity. Public editor Clark Hoyt earlier this month called it “the tip that didn’t pan out.” Critics suggested the donor lists could have been compiled through public records. But I have obtained the lists — not only of Obama donors, but also lists of Democratic National Committee, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry contributors. The records include small donors to the Obama campaign, who are not disclosed in public campaign finance databases. It’s information only a campaign could supply.

MonCrief testified under oath last fall that her then-boss, Karyn Gillette, gave her the Obama donor list and told her the campaign had furnished it. Moreover, e-mail messages between ACORN, Project Vote and other affiliates, including ACORN subsidiary Citizens Services, Inc. (CSI), make explicit references to working on “Obama campaign related projects.” The “list of maxed out Obama donors” is specifically mentioned in staff e-mail. Another message from ACORN/Project Vote official Nathan Henderson-James warns ACORN and affiliated staff to prepare for “conservatives … gearing up a major oppo research project on Obama.”

Henderson-James wrote, “Understand I’m not suggesting that we gear up to defend a candidate’s campaign.” But that, of course, is exactly what the ACORN enterprise did.

Why does this matter? Transparency, tax dollars and electoral integrity. ACORN’s own lawyer Elizabeth Kingsley acknowledged last year that a vast web of tax-exempt ACORN affiliates were shuffling money around — making it almost impossible to track whether campaign rules and tax regulations were being followed. ACORN receives 40 percent of its revenues from taxpayers. Americans deserve to know whether and how much commingling of public money with political projects has occurred over the last four decades — and what role the Obama campaign played in this enterprise.

Remember: Last August, the Obama team admitted its failure to properly disclose $800,000 in payments to CSI — which works hand in hand with Project Vote and the ACORN parent organization. Obama mysteriously reclassified the campaign advance work expenditures as “get-out-the-vote” activities. Nary a peep from electoral integrity watchdogs.

Despite heated denials from Team Obama, the links between ACORN, Project Vote and CSI are inextricable. As Obama himself reminded ACORN leaders after its political action committee endorsed his presidential candidacy in February 2008:

“I come out of a grassroots organizing background. That’s what I did for three and half years before I went to law school. That’s the reason I moved to Chicago was to organize. So this is something that I know personally, the work you do, the importance of it. I’ve been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career. Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work.”

As I’ve reported before, the Obama campaign’s “Vote for Change” registration drive, run simultaneously with ACORN/Project Vote, was an all-out scramble to scrape up every last unregistered voter sympathetic to Obama’s big-government vision.

In an e-mail message to whistleblower MonCrief last summer, New York Times reporter Stephanie Strom told the truth: “The real story to all this is how these myriad entities allow them to shuffle money around so much that no one really knows what’s getting spent on what.” By Oct. 6, 2008, Strom had thrown in the towel in the wake of blistering phone conversations with the Obama campaign. She wrote:

“I’m calling a halt to my efforts. I just had two unpleasant calls with the Obama campaign, wherein the spokesman was screaming and yelling and cursing me, calling me a right-wing nut and a conspiracy theorist and everything else. … I’d still like to get that file from you when you have a chance to send it. One of these days, the truth is going to come out.”

It’s only just begun.